Quantum interference of multi-orbital effects in high-harmonic spectra from aligned carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide
Liang Hong-Jing, Fan Xin, Feng Shuang, Shan Li-Yu, Gao Qing-Hua, Yan Bo, Ma Ri, Xu Hai-Feng
Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: rma@jlu.edu.cn xuhf@jlu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91750104, 11534004, 11874179, 11127403, 11474130) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province, China (Grant No. 20180101289JC).

Abstract

We investigate experimentally multi-orbital effects in high-order harmonic generation (HHG) from aligned CO2 and N2O molecules by intense femtosecond laser fields with linear and elliptical polarizations. For either of the aligned molecules, a minimum in the harmonic spectrum is observed, the position of which shifts to lower-order harmonics when decreasing the intensity or increasing the ellipticity of the driving laser. This indicates that the minimum originates from the dynamic interference of different channels, of which the tunneling ionization and recombination are contributed via different molecular orbitals. The results show that both the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and low-lying HOMO-2 in CO2 (or HOMO-1 in N2O) contribute to the molecular HHG in both linearly and elliptically polarized strong laser fields. Our study would pave a way for understanding multi-electron dynamics from polyatomic molecules irradiated by strong laser fields.

1. Introduction

The interaction of strong laser radiation with atoms or molecules results in various non-perturbative and highly nonlinear phenomena, such as high-order above threshold ionization (HATI),[1,2] non-sequential double (NSDI) and multiple ionization,[3] neutral high Rydberg state excitation (RSE),[4] and high-order harmonic generation (HHG).[5,6] Among them, HHG has attracted intense research interest, due to its potential applications as tabletop coherent radiation source in the extreme ultraviolet (XUV) and soft x-ray regions,[7] as well as attosecond pulses.[812] HHG facilitates measurements that could resolve electronic structure[13,14] and dynamic processes[15,16] on sub-femtosecond time scale and with sub-nanometer spatial resolution.

The physical picture of atomic HHG in a strong laser field is a well-known semi-classical three-step model:[17] (i) tunneling ionization of electrons in an atom or molecule, (ii) the quasi-free electrons are accelerated in the intense laser field, (iii) the high energy electrons recombine with the ionic core to emit redundant energy as coherent XUV photon flux. Molecules have much more complicated structures than atoms, which have multicenter and diverse geometric structure, large density of electronic states with different symmetries, as well as additional nuclear rotational and vibrational motions, providing extra parameters to control HHG.[1820] By studying HHG of aligned molecules, several experimental and theoretical observations[2125] have identified that both ionization and recombination are dependent on the symmetries of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and even lower-lying molecular orbitals (HOMO-1, HOMO-2, ). Based on the underlying physics of HHG from molecules, there are some approaches on ultrafast imaging of molecular orbitals. Itatani et al.[13] in their experiments reported for the first time the tomographic reconstruction of HOMO from aligned N2 molecules. Baker et al.[26] used molecular HHG to detect the ultrafast motions of protons of H2 and CH4 with attosecond temporal resolution. The internuclear distance of molecule can also be analyzed by observing the two-center interference minimum of HHG spectra.[14,27] Nevertheless, some other mechanisms of HHG from polyatomic molecules are still kept ambiguous, such as Coulomb field influence and multiple orbital coupling.

Here we experimentally investigate and compare the HHG spectra from aligned triatomic molecules CO2 and N2O by femtosecond strong laser field. While both molecules are linearly structured, N2O is asymmetry triatomic molecules with a symmetry which has a permanent dipole moment. On the other hand, both molecules have same numbers of electrons and nearly identical internuclear distance ( in CO2, , in N2O), as well as similar HOMO orbitals. A comparison study on harmonic spectra of aligned N2O and CO2 would add more knowledge to the molecular structure effect on HHG in strong laser fields.

There are some studies that have been reported on the molecular structure and multi-electron dynamics of HHG from CO2 or N2O.[15,2830] Smirnova et al.[15] have reported the minimum position of the HHG spectra in CO2 molecules which is related to the intensity of the driving laser. This observation is interpreted in terms of the destructive interference from different molecular orbitals (HOMO and HOMO-2) for high-harmonic emission. Wörner et al.[28] have observed that the positions of the minima of harmonic spectra from aligned CO2 shifted by over more than 15 eV with the change of both wavelength and intensity of the driving laser. Rupenyan et al.[29] investigated the effects of electronic structures and multi-electron dynamics on the harmonic spectra from CO2 and N2O by using near-infrared driving laser fields in the wavelength range of . The results indicated that the minimum of harmonic spectrum driven by laser fields with shorter wavelength ( ) would be located at higher-order harmonics near the cut-off region, while changing to the driving laser field with a longer wavelength (1.36 and ), the minimum of harmonic spectrum would be distinctly positioned in the plateau region. Recently, Monfared et al.[30] performed a theoretical study on the effects of inner orbitals and multiple electrons on the harmonic spectrum. These elaborated studies indicated that both the molecular orbital structure and the interference of multi-orbitals affect the minimum position of HHG. The fact that the position of the minimum is controllable by the intensity and wavelength of the driving laser is now understood by the destructive interference between different channels in ionization and recombination processes of HHG. The majority of previous studies are performed by using the driving laser with linear polarization. Comparing to linearly polarized laser field, the freed electron dynamics during HHG process can be tuned by controlling the laser field ellipticity. The elliptically polarized driving laser field would provide additional freedom degrees to control the high harmonic generation. For example, Mairesse et al.[31] experimentally and theoretically investigated the HHG of aligned CO2 and N2 molecules in elliptically polarized laser field, the results of which show that the electron wavepacket can be controlled in the process of HHG.

In our study, we investigate and compare HHG of aligned CO2 and N2O molecules in both linearly and elliptically polarized laser field. The harmonic yield is measured with different intensity and ellipticity of the driving laser field. Based on our experimental observations, we discuss the multi-orbital effects and multi-electronic dynamics on HHG from aligned CO2 and N2O in strong laser fields.

2. Experiments

The experimental setup used for generation and detection of HHG has already been described in our previous work.[3234] Briefly, a Ti: sapphire laser system operating at 1 kHz repetition was used to deliver ∼35 fs pulses centered at 800 nm. The output pulse is divided into two parts by using a 30:70 beam splitter. One laser beam with lower energy (aligning laser) was used to excite rotational energy levels and form rotational wave packets of CO2 or N2O molecules. The other beam with higher energy (driving laser) was used to drive the aligned molecules to generate harmonics. The ellipticity of the driving laser was changed by a combination of an adjustable zero-order half-wave plate placed before a zero-order quarter-wave plate with fixed optic axis. This configuration minimizes the diffraction efficiency of spherical grating affected by the polarization of HHG. A motorized delay stage was inserted into the path of driving laser to control the relative delay time between the two laser pulses. A half-wave plate and a Glan-laser polarizer were placed in the path of each laser beam to adjust its intensity. The polarization angle Θ between the aligning and driving lasers was adjusted by using a half-wave plate placed in the path of the aligning laser. After focused by a focal length 300 mm, the aligning laser and the driving laser were collinearly sent into the gas zone to align the molecules and generate harmonics. The intensity of the aligning laser at the interaction region was about 7×1013 W/cm2. The backing pressure of CO2 or N2O (gas purity at 99.999%) gases was 2 bar. The gaseous samples were continuously expanded into the interaction vacuum chamber through a orifice, leading to the density of gas was about 1017 cm−3 and the rotational temperature was estimated to be ∼100 K. The harmonics generated in the gas zone were spectrally dispersed by a spherical grating with a groove density of 1200 groves/mm and then focused onto a microchannel plate detector attached with a phosphor screen. A CCD camera was used to image the phosphor screen and transferred to a computer.

3. Results and discussion

In our study, we investigate the harmonics from aligned molecules by varying the driving laser intensity and polarization, which would add our understanding on the multi-orbital effect of molecular HHG. We first investigate the alignment of molecules by measuring the harmonic intensities on the delay time between the aligning and driving lasers. The polarization of the two lasers are set to be parallel to each other. The results for the 27th harmonics for CO2 and N2O molecules are shown in Fig. 1(a) and Fig. 1(b), respectively. The duration of the aligning pulse (35 fs) used in the experiments is much shorter than the rotational period of each molecule (Trot=42.7 ps of CO2 and Trot=39.8 ps of N2O). The ultrashort aligning pulse will excite the randomly oriented molecules to form rotational wave packets.[35,36] As the rotational wave packets evolve in time, the molecules will be aligned periodically with the molecular axis parallel or perpendicular to the polarization of the aligning laser. The effect of such non-adiabatic impulsive alignment on molecules is reflected in the modulation of harmonic intensity, as shown in Fig. 1. To reduce the effect of instrumental response for qualitative comparison, we use the ratio to represent the harmonic intensity throughout the study, i.e., the measured harmonic intensity (S) from aligned molecules normalized to that from nonaligned molecules (S0). As shown in Fig. 1(a), obvious modulation of the harmonic intensity of CO2 molecule occurs at a delay time of ∼21 ps and ∼42 ps, corresponding to Trot/2 (half rotational revival) and Trot (full rotational revival), respectively. The half and full revivals are also evident for N2O molecules (Fig. 1(b)), while the 1/4 and 3/4 periods of revival are much weaker due to nuclear spin statistics.[37] In the following experiments, the delay time of alignment is fixed at 21.1 ps and 19.7 ps for CO2 and N2O molecules, respectively. That is, the molecular axis is aligned parallel to the polarization of the aligning laser.

Fig. 1. Ratio of the 27th harmonic intensity between aligned (S) and unaligned (S0) samples of CO2 (a) and N2O (b) molecules as a function of the delay time between the two laser beams. The polarization of the driving laser is parallel to that of the aligning laser. The Trot/2 (half revival) and Trot (full revival) are indicated in the figure.

In Fig. 2, we show the measured harmonic intensity of each order by changing the driving laser intensity in the range of 1.2×1014 W/cm2 to 2.0×1014 W/cm2 for aligned CO2 (Fig. 2(a)) and N2O (Fig. 2(b)) molecules. For either of the molecules, a minimum in the harmonic spectrum is clearly observed, which shifts to higher-order harmonics when increasing the laser intensity. For CO2, the minimum shifts from H23 at 1.2×1014 W/cm2 to H29 at 2.0×1014 W/cm2, and for N2O, from H23 to H27. The results of CO2 reproduce previous experimental studies by Smirnova et al.[15] and Wörner et al.,[28] while the experimental results of N2O are similar to those of Rupenyan et al.[29] Such minimum in harmonic spectrum is interpreted by the destructive interference of different channels induced by tunneling ionization from different molecular orbitals.[15] The structures of HOMO and lower-lying orbitals (HOMO-1 and HOMO-2) of CO2 and N2O are presented in Fig. 3, which are calculated by the density functional theory (DFT) method at the B3LYP/6-311++G** level with Gaussian 03[38] program and are plotted with Multiwfn package.[39] The HOMO, HOMO-1, and HOMO-2 of CO2 molecule exhibit , , and symmetry, respectively (Figs. 3(a)3(c)). Since the CO2 molecule is aligned parallel to the driving laser polarization, the tunneling ionization and recombination of HOMO-1 could be negligible, since the electron density distribution of the orbital has a nodal plane along the molecular axis (see Fig. 3(b)). It has been demonstrated that in this case, the destructive interference in HHG of CO2 is induced by the contributions of both HOMO and HOMO-2.[15] For N2O, the symmetry of HOMO is similar to that of CO2, that of HOMO-1 is a σ orbital, which is like the structure of HOMO-2 of CO2, and HOMO-2 exhibits a nodal plane along the molecular axis (Figs. 3(d)3(f)). Thus, this indicates that when the molecule is aligned parallel to the laser polarization, the destructive interference between the channels of HOMO and HOMO-1 results in the observed minimum in harmonic spectrum of N2O shown in Fig. 2(b).

Fig. 2. HHG ratios measured with (s) and without ( the aligning laser in CO2 (a) and N2O (b) as a function of harmonic order in linearly polarized driving laser with different intensities (1.2, 1.5, 1.8, and 2.0) ×1014 W/cm2, respectively.
Fig. 3. Orbital structures of HOMO, HOMO-1, and HOMO-2 of CO2 (a)–(c) and N2O (d)–(f) calculated by the DFT method at the B3LYP/6-311++G** level.

The effect of such destructive interference, also known as dynamic interference, replies on the phase difference of HHG from the two different channels. The phase is determined by the delay time between the tunneling ionization and recombination, which depends on the intensity of the driving laser field. Thus the minimum in harmonic spectrum shifts as the laser intensity is changed. The intensity-dependent interference from different channels in HHG of CO2 molecules has been discussed in detail in the pioneer paper by Smirnova et al.[15] The results in Fig. 2(b) show that similar phenomenon exists in the HHG of aligned N2O molecules. Our study further demonstrates that the minimum in HHG is common in molecules, which depend on the intensity of linearly polarized driving laser field and reflect the characteristic of dynamic interference from different molecular orbitals.

We further investigate the harmonic intensities from aligned CO2 and N2O molecules in elliptically polarized driving laser field. Figure 4 presents the harmonic ratio with the ellipticity of the driving laser ε = 0.18 or ε = 0.36 for aligned CO2 (Fig. 4(a)) and N2O (Fig. 4(b)). The intensity of the driving laser is kept at 2.0×1014 W/cm2 measured at the linear polarization (ε = 0). For either of the molecules, a noticeable shift of the minimum position toward lower-order harmonics can be seen for higher ellipticity of the driving laser. This finding can be understood in the following two concerns. Firstly, as we have mentioned above, the results of dynamic interference lead to the minimum appearing at lower order harmonics for lower driving laser intensity. The effective intensity (I) in an elliptically polarized laser will decrease comparing to that in a linearly polarized laser (I0), ). Thus one would expect the shift of the minimum in an elliptically polarized laser fields if the intensity I0 is kept at a constant value. Secondly, the initial conditions of tunneling ionization would be different for that in a linearly polarized laser fields, since additional drift velocity would be induced in an elliptically polarized strong laser field.[40] This would also affect the recombination process to produce HHG, including the delay time between ionization and recombination. In their study, Larsen et al.[41] have shown that the electron excursion time τ of HHG, corresponding with the delay time between ionization and recombination, would be changed upon varying laser ellipticity ε. This fact would in turn affect the position of the dynamic interference minimum, since it is related to the excursion time τ.[15] As a consequence, the minimum in the harmonic spectrum would be changed because the dynamics interference between channels is dependent on the ionization and recombination processes. Our experimental results will stimulate further insight studies, both experimentally and theoretically, to reveal the detailed physics of the dynamic interference in an elliptically polarized strong laser field.

Fig. 4. Harmonic ratio of aligned CO2 (a) and N2O (b) with the ellipticities ε = 0.18 (red circles) and ε = 0.36 (blue triangles), respectively.
4. Conclusions

In this work, we have performed an experimental investigation on the multiple orbitals effect in the HHG from aligned CO2 and N2O molecules by both linearly and elliptically polarized strong laser field. The position of the minimum in the HHG spectra could be shifted by the intensity and ellipticity of driving laser. The reason was interpreted as the dynamic interference of HHG from the HOMO and HOMO-2 in CO2 (or HOMO-1 in N2O). Our research results would shed some light for further studies on the multi-orbital effect in the interaction of molecules with strong laser fields.

Reference
[1] Milošević D B Paulus G G Bauer D Becker W 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 R203
[2] Zhang K Liu M Wang B B Guo Y C Yan Z C Chen J Liu X J 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 113201
[3] Becker W Liu X J Ho P J Eberly J H 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 1011
[4] Nubbemeyer T Gorling K Saenz A Eichmann U Sandner W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 233001
[5] Macklin J J Kmetec J D 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 766
[6] Li X Z Zhuo H B Zou D B Zhang S J Zhou H Y Zhao N Lang Y Yu D Y 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 094201
[7] Sansone G Benedetti E Calegari F Vozzi C Avaldi L Flammini R Poletto L Villoresi P Altucci C Velotta R Stagira S De S Nisoli M 2006 Science 314 443
[8] Zhao K Zhang Q Chini M Wu Y Wang X Chang Z 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 3891
[9] Li X Y Wang G L Zhou X X 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 013102
[10] Wu J S Jia Z M Zeng Z N 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 093201
[11] Li W Wang G L Zhou X X 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 123201 in Chinese
[12] Salehi M Mirzanejad S 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 054202
[13] Itatani J Levesque J Zeidler D Niikura H Pépin H Kieffer J C Corkum P B Villeneuve D M 2004 Nature 432 867
[14] Kanai T Minemoto S Sakai H 2005 Nature 435 470
[15] Smirnova O Mairesse Y Patchkovskii S Dudovich N Villeneuve D Corkum P Ivanov M Y 2009 Nature 460 972
[16] Li W Zhou X Lock R Patchkovskii S Stolow A Kapteyn H C Murnane M M 2008 Science 322 1207
[17] Corkum P B 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1994
[18] Walters Z B Tonzani S Greene C H 2007 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 F277
[19] Itatani J Zeidler D Levesque J Spanner M Villeneuve D M Corkum P B 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 123902
[20] Su N Yu S J li W Y Yang S P Chen Y J 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 054213
[21] Zhang J Wu Y Zeng Z Xu Z 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 033826
[22] Zhou X X Tong X M Zhao Z X Lin C D 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 061801
[23] Mcfarl B K Farrell J P Bucksbaum P H Guhr M 2008 Science 322 1232
[24] Li G H Xie H Q Yao J P Chu W Cheng Y Liu X J Chen J Xie X H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 224208 in Chinese
[25] Lin C D Jin C Le A T Lucchese R R 2012 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 45 194010
[26] Baker S Robinson J S Haworth C A Teng H Smith R A Chirilă C C Lein M Tisch J W G Marangos J P 2006 Science 312 424
[27] Vozzi C Calegari F Benedetti E Caumes J P Sansone G Stagira S Nisoli M Torres R Heesel E Kajumba N Marangos J P Altucci C Velotta R 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 153902
[28] Wörner H J Bertr J B Hockett P Corkum P B Villeneuve D M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 233904
[29] Rupenyan A Kraus P M Schneider J Wörner H J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 033409
[30] Monfared M Irani E Sadighi-Bonabi R 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 148 234303
[31] Mairesse Y Dudovich N Levesque J 2008 New J. Phys. 10 025015
[32] Niu Y Liang H J Liu Y Liu F Y Ma R Ding D J 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 074222
[33] Niu Y Liu F Y Liu Y Liang H J Yang Y J Ma R Ding D J 2017 Opt. Comm. 397 118
[34] Liang H J Wang Q X Fan X Shan L Y Feng S Yan B Ma R Xu H F 2018 Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 31 471
[35] Miyazaki K Kaku M Miyaji G Abdurrouf A Faisal F H M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 243903
[36] Seideman T Hamilton E 2005 Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52 289
[37] Lock R M Zhou X Li W Murnane M M Kapteyn H C 2009 Chem. Phys. 366 22
[38] Frisch M J Trucks G W Schlegel H B et al. 2004 Gaussian 03, Revision E.01 Wallingford CT Gaussian Inc.
[39] Lu T Chen F 2012 J. Comput. Chem. 33 580
[40] Khan S D Cheng Y Möller M Zhao K Zhao B Chini M Paulus G G Chang Z 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 161106
[41] Larsen E W Carlström S Lorek E Heyl C M Paleček D Schafer K J L’Huillier A Zigmantas D Mauritsson J 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 39006